Jeff Morrison vs Sam Querrey Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L W L L L L
Form
W L W W W L L L L LHead To Head: Morrison 1 - 0 Querrey
They have played 3 sets in total, with Morrison winning 2 and Querrey winning 1. The last match between Morrison and Querrey was at the 2006 Challenger of Santa Clarita California Challenger - Valencia, 11-04-2006, First, Hard with Jeff Morrison getting the victory 3-6 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jeff Morrison | 1 |
| Sam Querrey | 0 |
2006 Challenger of Santa Clarita California Challenger - Valencia(11-04-2006)
3
6
6
3
6
2
| Morrison | Stats | Querrey |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 85 | Highest Rank | 11 |
| 46 | Age | 37 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 3 | Titles | 17 |
| 57% (189-145) | Career Total W/L | 56% (483-375) |
| $70,620 | Career Prize Money | $7,761,555 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Shnaider VS Sevastova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Alexandrova VS Kasatkina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-3 6-2 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 11 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jeff Morrison Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 1-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-7(0) 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Sam Querrey Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Ilya Ivashka
Player
Sam Querrey
58%
(
74 of
128)
1st Serve %
61%
(
88 of
145)
13
Aces
19
5
Double Faults
18
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
68 of
88)
57%
(
31 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
17 of
57)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
32%
(
41 of
128)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
60 of
145)
147
Total Points Won
126
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(8) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andy Murray
Player
Sam Querrey
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve %
39%
(
15 of
38)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
3 of
23)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Sam Querrey
62%
(
53 of
86)
1st Serve %
61%
(
53 of
87)
2
Aces
20
3
Double Faults
7
85%
(
45 of
53)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
67%
(
22 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
19 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
87)
98
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Sam Querrey
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve %
69%
(
55 of
80)
6
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
6
88%
(
42 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
17%
(
11 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
85
Total Points Won
58
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Filip Krajinovic
Player
Sam Querrey
63%
(
52 of
82)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
6
Aces
19
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve Won
88%
(
37 of
42)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
22 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
77)
82
Total Points Won
77
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sam Querrey
Player
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
10
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sam Querrey
Player
Thomas Fabbiano
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
18
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sam Querrey
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
12
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
2
100%
(
38 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
12 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Sam Querrey
68%
(
57 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
5
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
41 of
50)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
24%
(
20 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
19 of
75)
83
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(4) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sam Querrey
Player
Robin Haase
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
9
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
96%
(
26 of
27)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (189/145) | Win/Loss | 56% (483/375) |
| 55% (438/365) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (1218/993) |
| 51% (4069/3837) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (11515/10789) |
| 58% (116/85) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (268/203) |
| 32% (8/17) | Clay Win/Loss | 48% (67/73) |
| 61% (35/22) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58% (67/49) |
| 59% (30/21) | Grass Win/Loss | 62% (81/50) |
| 0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0.88 |
| 166 | Aces Total | 9573 |
| 0.02 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 62 | Total Double Faults | 2592 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:3:15 |
| 500.26 | Average Opponent Rank | 517.14 |
| 56% (974/1728) | 1st Serve % | 59% (35973/60735) |
| 75% (670/899) | 1st Serve Win % | 79% (28578/36145) |
| 49% (348/713) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (12496/24863) |
| 43% (61/143) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 37% (1726/4659) |
| 38% (509/1351) | Return Points Win % | 34% (21218/61566) |
| 49% (18/19) | Slam W/L | 50% (61/62) |
| 59% (16/11) | Masters W/L | 48% (82/89) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 50% (15/15) |
| 47% (46/52) | Main Tour W/L | 59% (249/175) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 63% (109/63) | Challenger W/L | 72% (69/27) |
| 0% (0/0) | Futures W/L | 54% (7/6) |
| 58% (185/318) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (405/710) |
| 25% (4/16) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 51% (70/138) |
| 55% (81/147) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (226/459) |
| 56% (63/113) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (144/295) |
| 86% (187/161) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 77% (507/392) |
| 14% (187/26) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 22% (507/113) |
| 19% (147/28) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (350/89) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
